THE NEED FOR THESE GUIDELINES

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging technology with substantial potential to support scientific research. Scientific communities across various disciplines are actively exploring its capabilities, including its application in scientific writing, peer review, and editorial processes. However, the inappropriate use of AI may lead to academic misconduct and compromise research integrity. To promote the responsible and ethical use of AI by authors, reviewers, and editors, APJCN has developed these guidelines. The guidelines are based on widely accepted ethical principles within the scientific publishing community. Given the rapid evolution of generative AI technologies, these guidelines may be updated and revised as necessary.

GUIDANCE FOR AUTHORS

Permissible uses of AI

1. AI may be used for language editing, including grammar correction, sentence refinement, and improvements in clarity; however, the underlying ideas, arguments, and scientific reasoning must remain the original work of the authors.

2. AI-assisted tools, including retrieval-augmented systems, may be used to support literature searching, evidence synthesis, and reference formatting; however, authors must independently verify the accuracy, authenticity, and relevance of all cited sources.

3. AI may assist with data presentation, including visualization suggestions and consistency checks; however, the generation, alteration, or falsification of original data is strictly prohibited.

4. AI may be used to suggest manuscript structure and improve paragraph transitions; however, the research design, methodology, data analysis, and interpretation of findings must be developed independently by the authors.

5. AI may assist in the preparation of submission materials, including formatting checks, cover letter drafts, and

response templates; however, all final submission materials must be reviewed and approved by the authors.

6. AI may be used to support ethical self-assessment, including plagiarism alerts, conflict-of-interest reminders, and risk identification; however, such tools are advisory only and do not replace author responsibility for ensuring compliance with ethical standards.

Download this article

PDF format